Perhaps we should have seen it coming. Maybe it was always inevitable. Possibly the plan was fatally flawed from the very beginning.
America. No, wait. The United States of America. Sure, we regularly use the shorthand, but the 50 states and 5 unincorporated, permanently inhabited territories are not America. They are, in fact, not even most of America, which refers properly to two continents that comprise nearly all of the western hemisphere.
I bring this up because the 2020 presidential election, following four years of a presidency that has ripped the sheets off deep and abiding divisions and enflamed them nearly to the breaking point, has led to what may seem impossible-to-heal polarization. On the left there is talk of never forgiving those who have so egregiously wounded the fundamental bonds of democracy; and on the right there is talk of a new civil war, of secession. Each side is throwing around charges against the other of sedition and treason.
How very “American” of us.
We call ourselves the “United States,” but a degree of disunity has always been there, has always lingered in the shadows, waiting for its chance to break things apart.
Each of the “united” states has individual sovereignty. We have always been a federation of sovereign states, not a nation with a unitarian identity. Our differences and divisions have been part of who we are since before the revolution, and have been codified by the Constitution and the courts since the 18th century.
The most obvious manifestations of this have always centered around racism and slavery, but have expanded to include all kinds of arguments involving every kind of human characteristic that distinguishes white men as the natural ruling class; wealth as the equivalence of superior intelligence and ability; nominally Puritan ideas about sex, gender, matrimony and general morality as normative; protestant Christianity (itself rife with internal division) as the institution of authority for all things called god; and Manifest Destiny as the final word on the United States’ proper place in the world.
We are, in other words, not really designed to be a nation at peace with itself, with a singularity of purpose or vision.
In some ways, this has been our strength. We gave ourselves permission, whether the founders knew it or not, to become incredibly diverse, to become a melting pot, to become a home to so many who found themselves homeless in other nations. It gave us a foundation on which to build arguments of justice and freedom and fairness for non-whites, for immigrants, for the differently-abled, for LGBTQ+ individuals, for followers of a broad range of religious beliefs and doctrines or none at all, and all kinds of educational, economic, and cultural classes, communities, practices and personal choices.
But it has also allowed us to hang onto deeply rooted prejudices, and normalized discrimination. It has allowed us to abuse, disenfranchise, dehumanize our own citizens. It has allowed us to make self-aggrandizing claims of freedom, equality and justice while maintaining embedded exploitation, inequality, and injustice. Freedom has come to mean a measure of anarchy; equality has come to embrace the idea that the false is equal to the true and the harmful equal to the healthy; and justice has been reimagined as the rule of authoritarian law.
This is the great dilemma that must ultimately be resolved. Are we to be a single nation? Will we embrace in reality our idealistic pledge of indivisibility? Can we at last find a way to reconcile and repair our violent, bloody past and the long-festering, unhealed wounds of intolerance, bigotry, and human exploitation? Can we, in the 21st century, use this moment of open – even honest in its own way – polarization to become what we have fantasized ourselves to be?
Have we, at last, hit bottom?
For the moment, the ball is in the Progressives’ court. If meaningful change, lasting change, substantive change, is to happen, it will be because Progressives are able to seize this moment without rancor, without vengeance, without exacerbating the divisions that plague us, but by finding intelligent and effective solutions and advocating tirelessly for their implementation. It will require perseverance, patience, and genuine adherence and fidelity to our most important principles, even when we have to apply them to people we have heretofore denigrated as deplorable and dismissed as irredeemable.
I sincerely hope that we are up to the task.